Feb 072017
 

Individuals vary in how well they recognize, remember, and categorize faces and objects. This collaborative network funded by NSF aims at a broad understanding of such individual differences across a wide range of visual abilities and domains, to elucidate how both variation in general visual abilities and specific visual experiences affect our visual behavior. The project combines (1) ultra-high-field brain imaging at 7Tesla to map functional and anatomical brain measures trajectories in visual learning, (2) modern psychometric methods to create the necessary measures of individual differences in high-level visual ability, and (3) “deep” convolutional neural network models of vision that will be informed by brain and behavioral measures. These state-of-the-art tools will be integrated to account for individual differences in brain and behavior and to predict visual learning and performance.

Isabel Gauthier, Vanderbilt
Tom Palmeri, Vanderbilt
Sun-Joo Cho, Vanderbilt
Mike Tarr, Carnegie Mellon
Deva Ramanan, Carnegie Mellon
Gary Cottrell, USCD

 

 

 

 

 

Feb 072017
 

Our recent work investigating individual differences in recognition abilities has led us to research on the visual skills involved with medical imaging. To investigate how individual differences in vision relate to medical imaging skills, we first need to create a valid and reliable measure of such abilities. To this end, we have developed a new measure, the Vanderbilt Chest X-ray Test (VCXT), aimed at quantifying individual differences in perceptual abilities for x-ray decisions in novices.

Collaboration with Ed Donnelly at the Vanderbilt School of Medicine

Feb 072017
 

Prior studies show that visual imagery is a top-down reinstatement of visual perception, which likely extends to domains of visual expertise. But while self-reported vividness of mental images has been found to predict activity levels in visual areas, we found that self-reported vividness of mental images of cars is unrelated to subjects’ perceptual expertise with cars (Sunday et al., 2016). To further investigate this, we use functional MRI and multi-voxel pattern analysis to ask if car experts engage the fusiform face area during mental imagery of cars.

 

Feb 072017
 

Holistic processing has been extensively studied at the group level, but little work has been done to study individual differences in holistic processing. Our lab has created the Vanderbilt Holistic Processing Test (VHPT, Richler et al., 2015) that operationalizes holistic processing through the composite effect. We have attempted to use the part-whole effect to measure individual differences in holistic processing.

This work is supported by NSF.

Feb 072017
 

We repeatedly find that car recognition is independent from the recognition of other object categories, so the category seems to be special. We want to see if this independence is modulated by experience perceiving cars (similar to what has been found for face recognition in Balas & Saville, 2015). To test this, we will determine if cars are less independent from other object categories in a population living in a small town than a larger town. Since people from small towns likely have less experience perceiving cars, we predict that their car recognition ability will be less “specialized” than for people from larger cities. We are collaborating with researchers at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln to conduct experiments testing this hypothesis.

This work is supported by a NSF fellowship to Mackenzie Sunday.
Collaboration with Mike Dodd at University of Nebraska.

Jun 082012
 

Several studies have shown that at standard fMRI resolution, expertise with objects can engage the fusiform face selective areas. We are conducting work with high resolution fMRI to explore what is changing at a finer spatial scale when people acquire expertise with objects.

We are also using ultra-high resolution imaging to follow-up on our findings that cortical thickness in the fusiform face area can predict both face and object recognition ability, although in different directions. We are exploring the possibility that this reflects different age of acquisition for these different skills, resulting in individual differences reflected in different layers of the cortex, because of the action of different plasticity mechanisms (e.g., pruning vs. synaptogenesis and angiogenesis).

Jun 082012
 

How does experience change the functional specialization of the higher visual cortex? We are studying the behavioral and neural changes that take place when people acquire experience reading music. So far, we have found this kind of expertise to be qualitatively different from what has been obtained for “face-like” expertise (being good at individuating visually similar objects) or expertise with letters. Studying this and other kinds of experts allow us to develop a more general framework to explain perceptual expertise, one that can deal with learning all sorts of different skills.

This work is supported in part by NSF grant #SBE 0542013 to the Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center, an NSF Science of Learning Center.